<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Rights of a Sovereign Nation or Invasion of an Open Internet?</title>
		<description>Comments for Rights of a Sovereign Nation or Invasion of an Open Internet? at http://thectcnetwork.org , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://thectcnetwork.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:24:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://thectcnetwork.org/content/view/450/48/#comment-44</link>
			<description>Your headline question, &quot;Rights of a Sovereign Nation or Invasion of an Open Internet?&quot;  begs some definition of terms. what is a right and what is a sovereign nation?

Individual rights as inalienable and necessary to function as a human being are an attribute of being human.  This is the founding, fundamental idea behind the United States.  

From reading the USA founding documents we can see that a government's legitimacy is derived from its respect for individual rights.   

From that it follows that sovereignty of is derived from that legitimacy. 

Freedom of expression, spoken or written, means exactly that.  A sovereign country's right to abridge individual rights is a contradiction in terms at two levels - the proper meaning of &quot;right&quot; and the proper meaning of &quot;sovereign&quot;.  

How's that for cutting through the confusion by getting down to essentials?   - Jay Conne</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:14:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
