CTC Speakers

Home arrow Meetings arrow Previous arrow January 25, 2007
January 25, 2007 Print
Net Neutralitypro vs. con
.

The Internet was founded by educators and scientists as a means for the "ready and equal access by all".   A small church has the same access to information as a multi-billion dollar corporation.  Recently, applications such as video on demand and Internet Telephony are using a greater portion of network bandwidth and it is argued that these providers and their subscribers should pay a greater share of the burden for enriching the hardware that makes these applications deliverable by the carriers.

PRO: Net Neutrality protects the common Internet user from being blocked or having to pay more to get access to certain content.  This is a clear attack by Carriers to take over the free Internet to make more money for themselves.

CON: The cost for bandwidth drives carriers to spend billions to add more lanes on the information superhighway with no end in sight.  Content providers and their customers who use this bandwidth should pay their fair share of the infrastructure costs to support these applications or we could find ourselves starved for bandwidth.

MEDIATOR
Brian Deagon
Technology Journalist / Reporter / Editor
Investor's Business Daily

. . . .
  PRO Debator #1
Anthony Greenberg
CEO
RampRate Sourcing Advisors
CON Debator #1
John Savageau
Sr VP
Operations
CRG West
 
.
  PRO Debator #2
Jim Sevier

Founder/President
CNVRG Advisory Group
CON Debator #2
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
Founder / Chairman / CEO
WebXchange, Inc
 
.
  PRO Debator #3
Ariel Coro
CEO
The Aptive Group
CON Debator #3
S
kyler Visconti
Seasoned Technology Expert
 
 
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

CTC Community

Microsoft.jpg
Dolby.jpg
SpiderOil.jpg
GlobalCapital.jpg
Integrien.jpg